The Engineering Gap Assessment
You approved the change.
Can you prove it was implemented?
Most asset operators can’t. Not because their teams are careless, but because engineering information lives across systems that don’t stay in sync, through projects, changes, handovers, and audits.
We call this the Engineering Gap. Find out how wide yours is.
- Based on industry research and operator diagnostics
- 2 minutes to complete
- Results immediate
Where it shows up
Four places the Engineering Gap
costs you every single month.
The Engineering Gap is structural. It appears in four places, regardless of which systems you run.
01 / HANDOVER READINESS
Project-to-operations transfer
When completeness is declared, not verified. Engineering information is approved in the project. Asset systems, maintenance records, and operational data are expected to follow. In practice, they trail and handover is declared complete before every system reflects the new state.
You recognise this when: issues surface weeks after handover that should have been caught before it closed.
02 / Engineering Change Control
Engineering change management
When approved doesn’t mean implemented. A change is approved. Some systems are updated. Others are not. No single team owns completeness across all of them. Over time, systems drift and the gap between the approved state and the actual state quietly grows.
You recognise this when: you cannot say with certainty which system holds the current approved state.
03 / AUDIT READINESS
Audit and compliance readiness
When proof requires weeks of manual work. Regulators, insurers, and boards increasingly expect organisations to demonstrate — not claim — that approved changes are consistently reflected. When systems are not aligned, audit preparation becomes manual reconciliation under pressure.
You recognise this when: audit preparation starts weeks early and still feels incomplete on the day.
04 / ASSET DATA RELIABILITY
Digital twin and AI initiatives
When the data feeding your initiatives can’t be trusted. Digital twins, predictive maintenance models, and AI programmes depend on complete, current engineering data. When that data is unreliable, digital initiatives stall: not because the technology fails, but because the data does.
You recognise this when: more time is spent cleaning data than using it.
The Assessment
Find out where your Engineering Gap is and what it's costing you.
9 questions. 2 minutes. Your Engineering Gap Score across all four dimensions, with an immediate view of your rework exposure.
The full benchmark report is delivered by email within two minutes.
Rework Cost Calculator
A single number
into
your next meeting.
Most project rework traces back to one invisible issue: approved decisions that haven’t fully landed across every system involved; through changes, handovers, and audits. The math is simple, and usually unsettling.
Published industry benchmarks place typical rework on complex capital projects at 1% to 3%. On a €500M programme that is €5M to €15M in avoidable rework cost, before downstream operational consequences.
"
Knowing something is wrong is not the same as ensuring it is fixed. Assai Enterprise is the first platform we found that actually verifies completion across every affected system before a change is closed.
Head of Asset Integrity / Engineering change request
Common Questions
How long does the assessment take?
Nine questions. Two minutes. You receive your Gap Score report by email immediately after submitting.
Is this a sales tool in disguise?
No. Your Gap Score and benchmark report are yours regardless of what you do next. The 30-minute audit check is there if you want to discuss your results, but it is entirely on your terms.
What do I receive after submitting?
Your personalised Engineering Gap Score across four dimensions, an estimated rework exposure based on industry benchmarks, and a full benchmark report showing how your score compares to operators across asset-intensive industries. Delivered by email within two minutes.
How does my score compare to other operators?
Your report includes a benchmark based on industry research and operator diagnostics. The median operator sits in the Moderate to High band. Forty percent of operators score in the High exposure band — meaning the gap exists but ownership of completeness is unclear.
Is my data stored or shared?
Your responses are used solely to calculate your Engineering Gap Score and generate your report. They are not shared with third parties and are handled in accordance with our privacy policy.
Find out what your Gap Score
means for your environment.
A 30-minute conversation with one of our specialists. You bring your score and a real scenario from your operation. We tell you where the Engineering Gap is and what it would take to close it. No slides. No pitch.